Add unique identifier for test_phase3c_walk_recovery.gd

This commit is contained in:
2026-09-06 13:09:37 -04:00
parent 1f91f3d2e5
commit 80595a0273
53 changed files with 6806 additions and 471 deletions
+27
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
---
name: bugfix
description: "Executes a bugfix pipeline on one or more gitea issues: Developer -> Tester -> Reviewer"
---
## What I do
I orchestrate a sequential bugfix and verification pipeline - I will retrieve issues(s) from Gitea (title, body, images, comments, etc...). I will then forward information from the issues to the respective subagents.
Use gitea-mcp-server to interact with Gitea. Verify that the server is running and accessible.
If an issue is not provided, ask the user for the issue number(s).
1. **Developer**: Provides a code fix for each issue.
2. **Reviewer**: Audits the code and architectural soundness.
3. **Tester**: Runs tests related to the bugfix and determines if new unit tests, integration tests, or end-to-end tests are needed. If so, implement. Verify by running the test suite.
## Execution Rules
- Stop and ask the user for clarification if a step fails or is ambiguous.
- Use the `@` mention to trigger the respective subagents sequentially.
- Pass the context from the previous stage to the next stage to ensure consistency.
- Use multiple subagents to handle different aspects of the bugfix process if it will help.
## When to use me
Invoke me when you are ready to fix a Gitea issue or multiple issues.
+22
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
---
name: e2e-repair
description: "Runs playwright tests, captures errors, and triggers auto-repair."
---
## Logic
1. Execute: `npx playwright test [test_file]`
2. If Success:
- Report success.
- Exit.
3. If Failure:
- Capture output.
- Pass logs to @tester agent.
- @tester analyzes error and edits file.
- Repeat until success or max_retries reached.
## Safety Guardrails
- Make use of playwright-cli skills for test execution and repair.
- Max Retries: 3 per file.
- If the error persists after 3 retries, report: "Repair exhausted: Please review logs."
+23
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
---
name: feature-pipeline
description: "Executes the full dev-to-docs pipeline: Developer -> Tester -> Reviewer -> Writer."
---
## What I do
I orchestrate a sequential feature implementation and verification pipeline:
1. **Developer**: Implements the feature based on the spec.
2. **Reviewer**: Audits the code and architectural soundness.
3. **Tester**: Runs full unit/E2E test suites; repairs failures if found.
4. **Writer**: Updates README and API docs based on verified code.
## Execution Rules
- Stop and ask the user for clarification if a step fails or is ambiguous.
- Use the `@` mention to trigger the respective subagents sequentially.
- Pass the context from the previous stage to the next stage to ensure consistency.
## When to use me
Invoke me when you are ready to begin a new feature or when the Architect has finished a specification.
+22
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
---
name: fix-pipeline
description: "Diagnoses, fixes, and verifies bugs across Architect, Developer, Tester, and Writer."
---
## What I do
I resolve bugs by triaging ownership, applying code fixes, and running regression tests:
1. **Architect (Triage)**: Compares the bug report against existing `specs/` and codebase architecture.
- **Spec / Design Defect**: Updates `specs/` and `decisions.md`, then forwards to `@developer`.
- **Implementation Defect**: Forwards directly to `@developer` without updating specs.
2. **Developer**: Applies surgical code fixes adhering to Godot performance and typing rules.
3. **Tester**: Writes a GUT regression test, executes test suites, and verifies the fix (max 2 repair attempts).
4. **Writer** (Conditional): Updates README or API docs if external interfaces or setup instructions changed.
## Execution Rules
- Default to starting at Step 1 (`@architect`) for triage unless explicitly told `--dev-only`.
- Allow `@tester` a maximum of 2 auto-repair attempts for failing test suites before passing back to `@developer`.
- Stop and ask the user for clarification if any step fails or is ambiguous.
- Pass context from each completed stage to the next stage.
+25
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
---
name: spec-pipeline
description: "Executes the full dev-to-docs pipeline: Developer -> Tester -> Writer."
---
## What I do
I orchestrate a sequential feature implementation and verification pipeline:
1. **Architect**: Explores codebase, asks clarifying questions, and drafts the spec. *Waits for user approval before handoff.*
2. **Developer**: Implements the feature based on the spec.
3. **Tester**: Runs full unit test suites; repairs failures if found.
4. **Writer**: After updating README and API docs, review `docs/tech_debt_and_optimizations.md` for formatting consistency and ensure no duplicate entries exist.
## Execution Rules
- **Architect Gate**: Stop after Phase 3 and wait for user approval on the spec before calling `@developer`.
- **Tester Repair Limit**: Allow `@tester` a maximum of 2 auto-repair attempts for failing test suites. If tests still fail after 2 attempts, hand the error context back to `@developer` to fix the underlying implementation.
- Stop and ask the user for clarification if any step fails or is ambiguous.
- Use `@` mentions to trigger subagents sequentially.
- Pass context from each completed stage to the next stage.
## When to use me
Invoke me when you are ready to begin a new feature/fix or when the Architect has finished a specification.